Criticism site dispute results in reverse domain name hijacking


WIPO panelist says this isn’t a case of cybersquatting.

Shahryar Oveissi has been found guilty of reverse domain name hijacking in a dispute over three domain names.

Oveissi is the son of the former Shah of Iran’s Imperial Army, who was assassinated in Paris in 1984. He was raised in the United States and is involved in various entrepreneurial and philanthropic endeavors.

Michael Benjamin registered,, and to create sites critical of Shahryar’s father and to allege that Shahryar inherited his fortune. Oveissi argued Benjamin was cybersquatting with these registrations.

The panel ruled that the Complainant did not show he has trademark rights in his name.

In finding reverse domain name hijacking, World Intellectual Property Organization panelist W. Scott Blackmer  wrote:

The Panel finds that the Complainant brought the Complaint in bad faith, within the meaning of Rule 15(e), in an attempt at RDNH. The Complainant may feel that his reputation and that of his family have been unfairly impugned, but the UDRP is not the proper forum to resolve such issues. The Complainant should not have pursued a remedy designed only to protect trademark rights when he was unable to prove that he has such rights and that they were under attack.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:




We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.


More like this

2020 Q2 report: domains increase by 3.3 million (up 0.9%)

VeriSign, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRSN) today announced that the second...

Universities CEOs Attended the Most

Having a good education is one of the first...

Live domain auction grosses $2.2 million

Seven figure sale of highlights auction. Last week’s Right...

Mike Mann with Alex Pires and Krista Gable (video)

Mike Mann with Alex Pires and Krista Gable (video)